Transformasi Profesi Guru SMA di Era Society 5.0: Dari Knowledge Transmitter menuju Learning Experience Designer
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59837/jpnmb.v2i12.815Keywords:
Transformasi Profesi Guru, Guru SMA, Society 5.0, Pedagogi Digital, Inovasi PembelajaranAbstract
Perkembangan teknologi pada era Society 5.0 menuntut transformasi peran guru Sekolah Menengah Atas (SMA) dari sekadar knowledge transmitter menjadi learning experience designer. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perubahan peran profesional guru SMA dalam merancang pengalaman belajar yang inovatif, interaktif, dan berbasis teknologi. Metode penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif melalui studi literatur dengan menelaah berbagai jurnal ilmiah, buku, dan laporan penelitian terkait pedagogi digital, kompetensi guru abad ke-21, serta implementasi pembelajaran berbasis teknologi di pendidikan menengah. Hasil kajian menunjukkan adanya pergeseran paradigma dari teacher-centered learning menuju student-centered learning, di mana guru berperan sebagai fasilitator, perancang pengalaman belajar, serta pengelola lingkungan belajar digital melalui pemanfaatan platform pembelajaran daring, media interaktif, gamifikasi, dan pembelajaran berbasis proyek yang mampu meningkatkan keterlibatan, kreativitas, dan literasi digital peserta didik. Kesimpulan penelitian menegaskan bahwa keberhasilan pendidikan di era Society 5.0 sangat bergantung pada kesiapan guru dalam mengembangkan kompetensi pedagogik digital, kreativitas, serta kemampuan desain pembelajaran adaptif, sehingga diperlukan pelatihan berkelanjutan, penguatan literasi digital, dan dukungan kebijakan pendidikan untuk memperkuat transformasi profesi guru secara berkelanjutan.
References
Beauchamp, C., & Thomas, L. (2009). Understanding teacher identity: An overview of issues in the literature and implications for teacher education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(2), 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640902902252
Cabinet Office of Japan. (2016). The 5th Science and Technology Basic Plan. Government of Japan. Diakses dari: https://www8.cao.go.jp/cstp/english/basic/5basicplan_en.pdf
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. Diakses dari: https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/sites/default/files/product-files/Effective_Teacher_Professional_Development_REPORT.pdf
Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Herder and Herder.
Gibbons, A. S. (2014). An architectural approach to instructional design. Routledge.
Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Teachers College Press.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. (2020). Kebijakan Merdeka Belajar. Kemendikbud RI. Diakses dari: https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2020/02/mendikbud-tetapkan-empat-pokok-kebijakan-pendidikan-merdeka-belajar
Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. Jossey-Bass.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
OECD. (2019). TALIS 2018 results (Volume I): Teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1d0bc92a-en
Puentedura, R. R. (2006). Transformation, technology, and education. Diakses dari: http://hippasus.com/resources/tte/
Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08321509
Voogt, J., & Pareja Roblin, N. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.668938
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. A. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 807–840. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312040004807
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rhosa Apriyani Ningsih, Nabila Dwi Putri, Izzatul Qalbi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
